Supply / Demand Balance

Network utilization by model and region — where capacity is tight and where to act.

3 under pressure
  • 3 models under pressure — watch closelyInfra

    These models are at 75–92% utilization. Peak UTC hours may tip them into queue-building territory. Pre-emptive routing or idle-node activation is recommended.

    Open
  • Enable automatic idle-node routing for saturated modelsInfra

    666 nodes are currently idle. Routing overflow from pressure-zone models to compatible idle nodes could increase effective capacity by ~13% at zero cost.

    Open
Network utilization
58%
demand / provisioned capacity
Models healthy
10
of 18 live models
Idle nodes available
666
can absorb overflow demand
Regions with supply gap
0
of 7 active regions

Model capacity utilization

Demand (30d requests) as a share of provisioned node capacity

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Tier A
62%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Tier B
43%
0%75%100%
Over-supplied
3.1M req headroom
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Tier S
85%
0%75%100%
Under pressure
+0 req overflow
DeepSeek-V3
Tier A
72%
0%75%100%
Healthy
DeepSeek Coder V2
Tier A
69%
0%75%100%
Healthy
FLUX.1 [schnell]
Tier B
38%
0%75%100%
Over-supplied
1.9M req headroom
DeepSeek-R1
Tier A
82%
0%75%100%
Under pressure
+0 req overflow
Qwen 2 VL 72B
Tier Aerr 3.3%
68%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Tier A
59%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Tier B
62%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Mistral Large 2
Tier Aerr 3.3%
63%
0%75%100%
Healthy
FLUX.1 [dev]
Tier Aerr 3.1%
80%
0%75%100%
Under pressure
+0 req overflow
QwQ 32B Preview
Tier Berr 3.1%
40%
0%75%100%
Over-supplied
970.2K req headroom
BGE Large EN v1.5
Tier Cerr 3.3%
49%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Whisper Large v3
Tier Berr 3.4%
40%
0%75%100%
Over-supplied
838.5K req headroom
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Tier Aerr 3.4%
70%
0%75%100%
Healthy
Nomic Embed Text v1.5
Tier Cerr 3.5%
31%
0%75%100%
Over-supplied
712.1K req headroom
LLaVA 1.6 34B
Tier Aerr 3.4%
68%
0%75%100%
Healthy
| line at 75% = healthy ceiling| line at 92% = pressure thresholdcapacity = nodes × 1,500 req/day estimate

Regional supply pressure

Active developers per active node — higher ratio means more demand than supply

LATAM
1.2×devs/node
245 sup
Oceania
1.2×devs/node
100 sup
Asia
1.1×devs/node
796 sup
US
1.1×devs/node
454 sup
Africa
1.1×devs/node
97 sup
EU
1.0×devs/node
1,086 sup
MENA
1.0×devs/node
386 sup
| centre line = global avg (1.1× devs/node)Ratio > 1.4× flagged as supply gap

Region Opportunity Index

Where BD should focus tomorrow — ranked by opportunity size

1
EU
Balanced
Developers
1,093
Nodes
1,086

1.0× devs/node

2
Asia
Balanced
Developers
894
Nodes
796

1.1× devs/node

3
LATAM
Balanced
Developers
296
Nodes
245

1.2× devs/node

4
MENA
Balanced
Developers
384
Nodes
386

1.0× devs/node

5
US
Balanced
Developers
480
Nodes
454

1.1× devs/node

6
Oceania
Balanced
Developers
119
Nodes
100

1.2× devs/node

7
Africa
Balanced
Developers
102
Nodes
97

1.1× devs/node

Recruit nodes dev/node ratio > 1.5× global avg — developer demand not served by local supplyAttract devs dev/node ratio < 0.5× global avg — node capacity underutilised